“Bookends to Eternal Life: A literary analysis of the Gospel of John”.

By Hugh O’Donnell, ND THEO  64103, September 26, 2005.

The author of the Fourth Gospel used numerous literary techniques to convey information.  One literary technique was A, B, A’ symmetry. The author of John develops a topic (A), moves to an apparently unrelated, seemingly misplaced topic (B), and then returns to the original topic in an enhanced way (A’).  Four instances of this literary devise are present. All four instances are implicit emphasis of Jesus’ main teaching: Drink and eat Me as the source of Eternal Life…I am Eucharist. 

A literary device conveys information implicitly, “between the lines”.[1]  Literary devises also highlight or emphasize information. Brian Born[2]  lists irony, misunderstanding, multiple allusions, and symbolism as some of the literary techniques in John’s Gospel that have been identified by various writers.  Father Jerome Neyrey, a Biblical scholar at the University of Notre Dame, tells his students to look for “bookends” when reading John’s Gospel[3].  He suggests the appearance of bookends indicates a relationship between beginning and ending texts.  Charles Giblin[4] describes a similar literary symmetry. He describes four instances of the sequence “Suggestion, Negative Response and Positive Response” appearing in John. 

The main symmetrical bookend found in John surrounds two of Jesus’ miracles.  One miracle appears at the beginning and the other at the end of the Gospel.  Jesus’ first miracle is performed at a wedding in Cana (A).  The trailing bookend is performed at the “Last Supper” in Jerusalem (A’).  Examining these two bookend miracles, we notice both miracles involve a celebration meal.  In the first miracle, Jesus turns water into wine (A) on the third day of his public ministry (John 2:1).  In the final miracle, Jesus turns wine into His Blood (A’) three days before the end of his public ministry (B). 

 Interestingly, Jesus’ Eucharistic miracle (A’), turning wine into Jesus’ blood, performed at the Last Supper, is not treated explicitly in John’s Gospel like it is in the other three Gospels.  Jesus says “this is my blood” in Matthew 26:28, Mark 14:24 and Luke 22:20.  The author of John does not use these words.  John instead uses three chapters (14-17) to describe in great detail the full meaning and weight of Jesus’ Eucharistic Last Supper.  Instead of repeating these well known words used in the other three Gospels, he gives us a lengthy Discourse (B) by Jesus on the implications of this Passover meal not given in any of the other Gospels.  Instead of “this is my blood,” Jesus tells them clearly He is not just physical nourishment (A), He is the way the Truth and the Life (B)… He is the vine that leads to Eternal Life (A’) (John 14:6).  The author of John, by not repeating Jesus’ consecrating words like the other three Gospels, perhaps as another literary technique, adds implicit emphasis to the replacement meaning of His Passover miracle (A’).

In Luke’s Gospel, turning wine into blood is not Jesus’ last miracle.  Healing the ear of the high priest’s servant in the Garden of Gethsemane is Jesus’ last miracle for Luke.   Interestingly, all the other Gospels mention the ear was injured, but only Luke has Jesus’ healing the ear.  Again, this suggests the author of John may have purposely left out the healing so the miracle of the Eucharist (A’) could bookend his story.

Three additional instances of A, B, A’ bookend symmetry enhance other significant Eucharistic texts found in John.  In Chapter 3, we find the first mention of Nicodemus (A).  Numerous chapters later, the author returns to a much changed Nicodemus in John 19:39.  The mention of Nicodemus for the second time (A’) comes immediately following the Eucharistic “Blood and Water” paragraph of John 19:31-38 (B).  In this case, the second bookend mentioning of Nicodemus (A’) comes immediately after the important Eucharistic detail of blood and water flowing from Jesus’ body adding emphasis to blood and water as the source of Eternal Life (B).  In this case (A’) tells us to look at the text just before (A’) for the important (B) text that A and A’ prepare us for.

In Chapter 4, the author of John book ends another Eucharistic text.   The story first begins with dialog between Jesus and a Samaritan woman who comes to accept Jesus (A).  Jesus words to this woman are about a new drink as the source of Eternal Life (John 4:4-26.)   The author then changes his focus, right in the middle of Chapter 4,  by addressing His apostles with Eucharistic words about food and the harvest that leads to Eternal Life (John 4:27-38).  After telling His apostles about the food of Eternal Life (B), he book ends the Eucharistic discourse by returning to many other Samaritans in the village who have come to accept Him (A’) (John 4:39-42).

The fourth bookend appears in Chapter 6.  This bookend again surrounds the same topic: Jesus as the food and drink of Eternal Life.  In John 6:1-14, the author relates the story of the multiplication of loaves or bread (A).  In John 6:16-24, he changes the subject from multiplying the Bread of Life to walking on water (B).  The walking on water miracle is then followed by a return to the discourse on the Bread (A’) of Life (John 6:25-58).  Here (A) and (A’) are the important texts.  Interestingly, the events of Chapter 6 are mentioned as taking place near the Jewish feast of Passover.  The mention of Passover in Chapter 4 (A)  followed by its’ discourse on  food and meals as the source of Eternal Life (B) prepares the reader of John’s Gospel for the next mention of  Passover (A’) where Jesus replaces the traditional Passover meal with Him as the food and drink of Eternal Life. Here we have a bookend within a bookend. 

Summary

The author of the Gospel of John intentionally uses the literary device of “bookends” to emphasize the Eucharistic importance of Jesus’ ministry (B).    Jesus turned bread and wine into his Body and Blood during Passover (A’), three days before He ended his ministry.  The old understanding of Passover (A) as an important Jewish celebration marking release from Egyptian slavery to freedom in the Promised Land is replaced with Eucharist (A’).  Jesus’ Holy Thursday meal becomes the new celebration of His ministry (B) trumping all previous understandings of Passover.  His “Last Supper Discourse” is now the “Main Meal.”    Jesus is now our bread and drink.  He is the nourishment that will starve the slavery of death and feed the freedom of Eternal Life.
         The author of John placed the Cana miracle, changing water into wine (A), as a front literary bookend to Jesus’ most important and final miracle, the miracle of the Eucharist (A’).   The symmetry of these two miracles by the author of John, placed at the beginning and end of Jesus’ public teaching ministry (B), points to the great importance these two particular miracles have in punctuating Jesus’ Eucharistic message to His Church.  The A, B, A’ literary book ending of these Eucharistic texts add weight to Johannine exegetes who argue for the Sacramentary[5] of this Gospel.

 



[1] Culpepper, R. Alan. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983.

[2] Born, Brian. Literary Features in the Gospel of John. Directions. Vol 17-#2, pg 3-17, 1988.

[3] Jerome H. Neyrey. The Gospel of John Course Notes. Theo64103. Chapter 2, pg 1.

[4]Giblin, Charles. Suggestion, Negative Response, and Positive Action in St. John's Portrayal of Jesus  NTS 26, pg 197-211, 1980.

[5] Brown, Raymond E. The Johannine Sacramentary, Image Books, 1965, Pg 77-107